A quick breakdown about the Doughaslam.com website can be found further down:
Aspect | Summary |
---|---|
Website load speed: | 1.3887s this is quite good! |
Number of (outgoing) links: | 90 |
HTML size: | 67.8 kilobytes Too heavy |
meta-tag generator | WordPress 4.6.1 |
meta-tag specificfeeds-verification-code-b1c3SFZXMzN5N1Vqc3BmSzhaNWVEYnpXWW03NmlZb1YzS1h0cWhZc211YnRWMlRISHVNbkluNmdXU3BGaHB5RVdaNWJvTFkvVlUvWW81RC9iaVVadUwvS1dwdXZzMzAxNVlEaXQrME9ZSnVGL0U0RXBHbTRkYjkrTUFBaE11WDF8Z01CTGgyNWJjYXRteStObWI1OGRIWnNXZy9DcmRLYVhzUkRITzJISlkrcz0= | PKd1RVsLnBZuDYYN5zh4 |
meta-tag og:image:type | |
meta-tag og:image | http://doughaslam.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/3987206924_bc37ea597c_z-e1479351699605.jpg |
meta-tag og:description | [caption id=attachment_5737 align=aligncenter width=393] Image credit: Smallbrainfield[/caption] Craptivism Won't Kill You I have long been reluctant to festoon my social media profiles with the trappings of social activism (remember Twibbons?), because I don't really think I am doing anything concrete for a cause if I'm doing so- especially if that's all I'm doing. The latest, in the aftermath of the presidential election, is the safety pin. From what I have read, the safety pin as a sign of solidarity popped up after the Brexit vote in the UK, and now has been adopted by many in the US to show solidarity with women, people of color, Muslims, and other folks who fear being marginalized. I'm still not doing it. My Facebook and Twitter profiles are mine alone, and it's just not me to do it. If you asked me if you should do it, I would say don't bother- find more meaningful ways to show support or foment change. Donate, volunteer, demonstrate, whatever. That is, however, not the same as saying you're a dummy if you do it. Awareness is a fine thing, and just as my social media profiles are mine, yours are yours just the same. While my cranky disposition might lead me to agree with this HuffPo article decrying the safety pins as useless, I don't; I think the author went too far. What I did not expect was several friends to agree with the premise of the article. I found that interesting, and it made me aware (as if I weren't already) how on edge people are as they don't know what the new administration will mean for tolerance for gender, sexual preference, race and religion (so far, I agree we have reason to be all het up). There is a very good discussion of this issue on my friend Amy Vernon's Facebook wall (where, yes, I used the term craptivism, of which I am proud despite my nuanced view, though I am sad I can't cliam coinage). Still, if a safety pin on your Facebook page makes you feel better, do it. Just because it doesn't do anything- and good intentions aren't enough- doesn't mean it's doing any harm. [caption id=attachment_5739 align=aligncenter width=640] STOP THE PRE...toolate[/caption] The Rise and Fall of Fake (False?) News Sites, and Responsible Reading For years I have advocated the responsibility of the reader, meaning rather than hoping for the impossible - that content will improve and be authoritative and unbiased- one should simply consider the source when reading and adjust for biases and context. The election, of course, has turned the concept of fake news on its ear. But please- incendiary biased (if not outright fake - you be the judge) sites like Breitbart.com on the right and DailyKos on the left (I might betray my own bias to say that, despite the fact I can't stand reading it, I think DailyKos is far less problematic as ajournalism outfit). Well, after the election (in other words, too late for the election), Facebook says it will filter out fake sites. Where's the line? Have the obvious leanings of the editorial pages of The Washington Post (particularly this election season), The Wall Street Journal and The Hill gone to the point where they might qualify. Some folks might say yes. I doubt they are targets. Will we be deprived of The Onion and The Borowitz Report because people are too stupid to know they are satire? I hope not. Can I report a news source I disagree with as fake? That would be silly. There are some sites (such as the teenage Macedonian clickbait) that are obvious targets for this cleanup, but is the line that clear otherwise? This might be fun to watch, just as Twitter's sudden conversion to banning alt-right (sometimes known as racist, misogynist spew) Twitter accounts, as they try again to get acquired, is entertaining. That's two. Not five. It's enough. We're all exhausted. use the extra time to read something better. |
meta-tag viewport | width=device-width, initial-scale=1 |
meta-tag og:image:width | 200 |
meta-tag og:title | Social Media Top 5: Craptivism Won’t Kill You and Fake News is Alright (Not Really) |
meta-tag og:url | http://doughaslam.com/2016/11/16/social-media-top-5-craptivism-wont-kill-you-and-fake-news-is-alright-not-really/ |
meta-tag og:image:height | 188 |
HTTP/1.1 200 OK Server: nginx/1.10.2 Date: Sun, 27 Nov 2016 23:02:05 GMT Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Length: 69438 Connection: keep-alive Vary: Accept-Encoding,Cookie,User-Agent Cache-Control: max-age=3, must-revalidate WP-Super-Cache: Served supercache file from PHP Last-Modified: Sun, 27 Nov 2016 23:01:03 GMT Cache-Control: max-age=2592000 Expires: Tue, 27 Dec 2016 23:02:05 GMT
The following domains are, too, hosted on 69.89.31.183:
Strangely, no meta keywords are used by the website Doughaslam.com.
Based on A and B block, the following IP adresses are similar to 69.89.31.183
Website address | IP in detail |
---|---|
69.89.10.85 69.89.10.85 | |
69.89.0.201 centos5.server.softslate.com | |
69.89.11.232 69.89.11.232 | |
69.89.105.15 revdns-69-89-105-15.acdtech.com | |
69.89.10.220 69.89.10.220 | |
69.89.10.41 69.89.10.41 | |
69.89.12.11 69.89.12.11 | |
69.89.12.103 sabonay.com | |
69.89.11.209 69.89.11.209 | |
69.89.122.91 69.89.122.91 | |
69.89.0.188 teracomtraining.com | |
69.89.1.77 zcs-mta.vps-host.net | |
69.89.11.115 server1.alpine4u.net | |
69.89.12.2 69.89.12.2 | |
69.89.10.35 69.89.10.35 | |
69.89.10.29 69.89.10.29 | |
69.89.11.158 wfp.co | |
69.89.0.179 69.89.0.179 | |
69.89.10.189 rflambda.com | |
69.89.12.105 69.89.12.105 | |
69.89.10.74 69.89.10.74 | |
69.89.11.4 centos5.osric.net | |
69.89.11.143 web3.sayforexample.com | |
69.89.12.43 sub.idivinesolutions.com | |
69.89.12.32 guytal.com | |
69.89.12.71 69.89.12.71 | |
69.89.12.19 centos5.garshol.virtual.vps-host.net | |
69.89.116.94 69-89-116-94.static.acd.net | |
69.89.10.239 69.89.10.239 | |
69.89.10.117 apotheke4all.com | |
69.89.10.134 69.89.10.134 | |
69.89.12.242 69.89.12.242 | |
69.89.10.219 69.89.10.219 | |
69.89.10.87 69.89.10.87 | |
69.89.0.113 web1.lotustours.net | |
69.89.107.122 smtp.willsub.com | |
69.89.10.215 69.89.10.215 | |
69.89.11.254 69.89.11.254 | |
69.89.11.55 69.89.11.55 | |
69.89.0.241 ohshow.virtual.vps-host.net | |
69.89.105.5 revdns-69-89-105-5.acdtech.com | |
69.89.12.227 idomain.cc | |
69.89.10.118 69.89.10.118 | |
69.89.10.27 69.89.10.27 | |
69.89.12.74 69.89.12.74 | |
69.89.0.86 drchristopherkimball.virtual.vps-host.net | |
69.89.12.143 69.89.12.143 | |
69.89.12.229 drugtestingnetwork.com | |
69.89.10.173 69.89.10.173 | |
69.89.12.76 69.89.12.76 |
The following domain extensions are available for the domain name, with a total of 730 variations available:
As mentioned by Alexa on their official page, the Alexa rank or rating is calculated using a number of different parameters, such as daily average of unique visitors as well as pageviews over the last three months. The more unique visitors and pageviews, the higher the overall rank.
Lowest rating: | 970,217 spotted 3,757 days ago |
---|---|
Current rating: | 920,788 spotted 3,753 days ago |
Best rating: | 920,788 spotted 3,753 days ago |
Average rating: | 944,842 |
Visitors frequently mistype doughaslam.com.
Here is a list of most common misspellings:
It seems doughaslam.com has only been registered once and was never abandoned or has never expired.
Established in 2006, the technology company Quantcast provides audience measurements and an opportunity for advertising in real time. In addition to that, the American company ensures public access to all sorts of website-related data (traffic and demographic) for millions of websites, as well as in-depth user insights to digital bloggers and publishers enrolled in Quantcast's Quantified Publisher Program. The processing capability provided by Quantcast is impressive – over 800 thousand transactions per second, with, as claimed by the company, accurate audience calculation for over 100 million online destinations. In 2013, Quantcast was widely believed to be among the top five of world's largest data processing companies. Holding offices in London, Dublin, New York and Chicago, the main headquarters of Quantcast is in San Francisco, CA.
Current rating: | 758,478 spotted 3,785 days ago |
---|---|
Worst rating: | 759,470 spotted 3,811 days ago |
Best rating: | 758,434 spotted 3,786 days ago |
Average rating: | 758,993 |
Other lists the domain doughaslam.com appears in are: